Education 2.0 & 3.0
148.6K views | +1 today
Follow
Education 2.0 & 3.0
All about learning and technology
Curated by Yashy Tohsaku
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Moodle and Web 2.0
Scoop.it!

3 ways to train your brain to perform better under pressure

3 ways to train your brain to perform better under pressure | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it
Life is filled with high-pressure situations. But you can teach your brain to perform better in these scenarios.

Via John Evans, Juergen Wagner
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Business Brainpower with the Human Touch
Scoop.it!

This Is How The Way You Read Impacts Your Memory And Productivity

This Is How The Way You Read Impacts Your Memory And Productivity | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

It’s no understatement that digital mediums have taken over every aspect of our lives. We check what our friends are doing on the glowing screens in our hands, read books on dedicated e-readers, and communicate with customers and clients primarily through email. Yet for all the benefits digital mediums have provided us, there has been a growing body of evidence over the past several years that the brain prefers analog mediums.

 

Studies have shown that taking notes by longhand will help you remember important meeting points better than tapping notes out on your laptop or smartphone. The reason for that could be that “writing stimulates an area of the brain called the RAS (reticular activating system), which filters and brings clarity to the fore the information we’re focusing on,” according to Maud Purcell, a psychotherapist and journaling expert. If that’s the case, and the analog pen really is mightier than the phone, it’s no wonder some of my colleagues have ditched smartphones for paper planners.


Via The Learning Factor
The Learning Factor's curator insight, October 11, 2017 6:09 PM

Studies show that reading printed material instead of on screens helps you better retain information.

CCM Consultancy's curator insight, October 17, 2017 1:54 AM

Slow down and take more time reading the material, and you might absorb the information.

Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Moodle and Web 2.0
Scoop.it!

How to improve your moodle performance? Check out these excellent tips #Moodle

How to improve your moodle performance? Check out these excellent tips #Moodle | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it
Moodle as a LMS is the best in the world but due to its large code base and modular architecture it may become a resource intensive application for your server until you optimze and fine tune it. As a Moodle server administrator, you may face problems with optimizing the Moodle performance on your server.

All server applications needs to be fine tuned to optimized use of server resources which is the same case with Moodle. It also needs to be fine tuned and optimized to improve the performance.

Moodle can be made to perform very well, at small usage levels or scaling up to many thousands of users. The factors involved in performance are the same as for any PHP based database-driven system.

Via Miloš Bajčetić, Juergen Wagner
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Business Brainpower with the Human Touch
Scoop.it!

Create a Growth Culture, Not a Performance-Obsessed One

Create a Growth Culture, Not a Performance-Obsessed One | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

Here’s the dilemma: In a competitive, complex, and volatile business environment, companies need more from their employees than ever. But the same forces rocking businesses are also overwhelming employees, driving up their fear, and compromising their capacity.

 

It’s no wonder that so many C-Suite leaders are focused on how to build higher performance cultures.  The irony, we’ve found, is that building a culture focused on performance may not be the best, healthiest, or most sustainable way to fuel results. Instead, it may be more effective to focus on creating a culture of growth.

 

A culture is simply the collection of beliefs on which people build their behavior. Learning organizations – Peter Senge’s term — classically focus on intellectually oriented issues such as knowledge and expertise.  That’s plainly critical, but a true growth culture also focuses on deeper issues connected to how people feel, and how they behave as a result. In a growth culture, people build their capacity to see through blind spots; acknowledge insecurities and shortcomings rather than unconsciously acting them out; and spend less energy defending their personal value so they have more energy available to create external value. How people feel – and make other people feel — becomes as important as how much they know.

 

Building a growth culture, we’ve found, requires a blend of individual and organizational components:

 

An environment that feels safe, fueled first by top by leaders willing to role model vulnerability and take personal responsibility for their shortcomings and missteps.A focus on continuous learning through inquiry, curiosity and transparency, in place of judgment, certainty and self-protection.Time-limited, manageable experiments with new behaviors in order to test our unconscious assumption that changing the status quo is dangerous and likely to have negative consequences.Continuous feedback – up, down and across the organization – grounded in a shared commitment to helping each other grow and get better.
Via The Learning Factor
The Learning Factor's curator insight, March 8, 2018 4:48 PM

You need four things to do it.

Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Business Brainpower with the Human Touch
Scoop.it!

A 6-Year Study Reveals the Surprising Key to Team Performance (and 9 Ways to Enable It)

A 6-Year Study Reveals the Surprising Key to Team Performance (and 9 Ways to Enable It) | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

Psychologist John Gottman can predict whether or not a married couple will be together five years later with startling 90 percent accuracy. How does he do it?

 

He watches them argue.

 

The ability to engage in healthy, productive debate is not only essential for ensuring a long marriage--it's also the key determinant of high performing teams.

 

A recently released six-year study cites the ability to manage conflicting tensions as the most critical predictor of top-team performance. Berkeley research shows teams that debate their ideas have 25 percent more ideas altogether and that companies like Pixar embrace healthy debate as a vital part of their performance (in its case to make better films).

 


Via The Learning Factor
The Learning Factor's curator insight, October 11, 2017 5:37 PM

A recently reported six-year study revealed that high-performing teams need to be good at this (and it's not so easy).

CCM Consultancy's curator insight, October 12, 2017 1:42 AM

A six-year study cites the ability to manage conflicting tensions as the most critical predictor of top-team performance. Berkeley research shows teams that debate their ideas have 25 percent more ideas altogether and that companies like Pixar embrace healthy debate as a vital part of their performance.

Rescooped by Yashy Tohsaku from Business Brainpower with the Human Touch
Scoop.it!

Performance Management: We Won’t Fix the Problem by Ignoring It

Performance Management: We Won’t Fix the Problem by Ignoring It | Education 2.0 & 3.0 | Scoop.it

To meet this goal, a performance management system must provide some way to determine how employees are performing relative to their co-workers. Yet there is currently a trend in HR to “fix” performance management by eliminating the use of methods that compare employees based on performance.


This makes no sense since this is the very thing senior business leaders want from performance management!

 

The 2 performance management methods:


Via The Learning Factor
The Learning Factor's curator insight, August 5, 2014 7:49 PM

When I ask business leaders in large companies what they want from performance management systems, the answer usually includes “identify the top performers in the company.”

Graeme Reid's curator insight, August 5, 2014 8:29 PM

If we want to fix performance management, we must create methods that accurately classify employees based on past performance in a way that maximizes their future performance and retention.  Rating employees to fit a bell-curve distribution is nonsensical, but identifying your top 10% of performers makes a lot of sense.

Ian Berry's curator insight, August 7, 2014 1:47 AM

Performance management like people management is dead. The question to ask of all performance systems Does our system inspire and make it simple for people to bring their best to their work? Any answer other than a resounding yes means system must be improved.